Posted on November 11, 2008 | 5 comments |
Film
Music
Canadian TV
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on November 7, 2008 | 6 comments |
Doctor Who
Film
Theatre
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on October 23, 2008 | 1 comment |
Film
Theater/Theatre
Polish TV
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on October 22, 2008 | 19 comments |
Today's TV musing is about writers. Now it can't have escaped your notice but fiction doesn't emerge fully formed from the sea onto our TV screens – there are these people called writers who create all the words and deeds depicted in dramas, comedies and even some 'reality' TV shows.
No two writers are the same, of course, each usually having their own 'voice' – a way of writing dialogue, a way of developing and introducing characters, a way of plotting that is unique to them. But on a TV show, that isn't always a good thing.
On a serial or long-running show, sometimes you don't want individual writers' scripts to stand out from the others; you want them all more or less the same because you have ongoing character arcs, back story, established forms of behaviour for the protagonists and so on. If a writer's script stands out, it's probably because it's inconsistent with the other episodes, which you don't usually want.
On many TV shows, there is a special role specifically for making sure scripts all mesh together nicely. In the UK, that's the script editor; in the US, it's usually the 'show runners' or exec producers – who unlike their film counterparts are typically writers who have ascended the career ladder.
Of course, there can be problems when the script editor/exec producer also writes scripts, because there's no one there to check their work for consistency and because they typically give themselves more latitude than they do to other writers. It's not always the case: you'd be hard-pressed to work out which Lost scripts are by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, which Mad Men scripts are by Matthew Weiner.
But take The Unit, for example. One of the exec producers on that is David Mamet. Yes, the David Mamet – the award-winning playwright and screenwriter who wrote Glengarry Glen Ross, Speed-the-plow, The Verdict and Wag The Dog, to name but a few classics. Who's going to edit his stuff, let alone himself?
So whenever Mamet writes a script for The Unit, it's always massively at odds with all the other scripts and contains an overload of his usual obsessions (martial arts, con tricks, overly manly behaviour). Surprisingly, they're never as good as the scripts by the other producers, sister Lynn Mamet and Eric L Haney, on whose book the show was based.
Callan is another show that comes to mind. Creator James Mitchell resolutely refused to acknowledge there had been any character development in between his contributions to the four series, so whenever he wrote a script, every character immediately reverted back to the behaviours and relationships they'd exhibited in the original pilot play.
Yet there are some shows where different voices are tolerated and allowed. Take Doctor Who. Although show runner/exec producer Russell T Davies can rewrite up to 60% of a script created by one of the other writers, you can still usually tell when Gareth Roberts or Steven Moffat is writing the week's episode – or when it's one of his own. And that's actually a great delight.
So today's question: how much should individual writers' voices be heard on TV shows – does it depend on the type of show and is the reason it's tolerated on some shows because there are only a few decent writers on the show and we just notice when there are some good episodes for a change?
Posted on September 5, 2008 | Post a comment |
Doctor Who
Film
Commercials
Theatre
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on August 26, 2008 | 4 comments |
Doctor Who
Awards
Film
Radio
Canadian TV
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on July 2, 2008 | 2 comments |
Film
Radio
Theatre
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on June 18, 2008 | 1 comment |
In the US: Mondays, 8/7c, ABC Family
Danger, Will Robinson! The engines canna take it, Captain. There are simply too many pop culture references, Mrs Peel, and unless you fetch Skippy right now, Commissioner Gordon is going to be in serious trouble.
Welcome to The Middleman, a show that pelts you with a 1,001 ironic references per second without ever really knowing why or what it's even satirising. It's still funny, though.
Continue reading "Review: The Middleman 1x1"
Posted on June 17, 2008 | 3 comments |
In the US: Tuesdays, 9/8c, Fox. Starts 9th Sept
In the UK: Not yet acquired, because the UK ain't buying not nothing right now
There are things in the world that can't be explained, like the popularity of jazz or mysterious phenomena such as UFOs. Then there are other things that are far more easily explained, such as 'déjà vu' – the feeling that you've seen something before. That's usually because you have. In the case of Fringe, it's because you probably saw an episode of The X-Files once and buried it in the back of your mind.
Fringe, despite the initial presence of government agents investigating weird and spooky things, is fortunately more than just a simple retread of past Fox successes. It's a disturbing glimpse into a parallel world in which weird fringe science of the 70s actually turned up results, results that are affecting – and sometimes destroying – life as we know it in the present.
Continue reading "Preview: Fringe"
Posted on June 4, 2008 | Post a comment |
Film
Awards
Commercials
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Click below to view videos...
Read more on Is TV better than film?