Surprisingly, I haven't much to say about season two of Mad Men. Okay, I've got a bit, which you can join me after the jump for.
Continue reading "Season finale: Mad Men (season two)"
Posted on October 29, 2008 | Post a comment |
Surprisingly, I haven't much to say about season two of Mad Men. Okay, I've got a bit, which you can join me after the jump for.
Continue reading "Season finale: Mad Men (season two)"
Posted on October 29, 2008 | 2 comments |
Film
Theatre
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on October 22, 2008 | 19 comments |
Today's TV musing is about writers. Now it can't have escaped your notice but fiction doesn't emerge fully formed from the sea onto our TV screens – there are these people called writers who create all the words and deeds depicted in dramas, comedies and even some 'reality' TV shows.
No two writers are the same, of course, each usually having their own 'voice' – a way of writing dialogue, a way of developing and introducing characters, a way of plotting that is unique to them. But on a TV show, that isn't always a good thing.
On a serial or long-running show, sometimes you don't want individual writers' scripts to stand out from the others; you want them all more or less the same because you have ongoing character arcs, back story, established forms of behaviour for the protagonists and so on. If a writer's script stands out, it's probably because it's inconsistent with the other episodes, which you don't usually want.
On many TV shows, there is a special role specifically for making sure scripts all mesh together nicely. In the UK, that's the script editor; in the US, it's usually the 'show runners' or exec producers – who unlike their film counterparts are typically writers who have ascended the career ladder.
Of course, there can be problems when the script editor/exec producer also writes scripts, because there's no one there to check their work for consistency and because they typically give themselves more latitude than they do to other writers. It's not always the case: you'd be hard-pressed to work out which Lost scripts are by Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, which Mad Men scripts are by Matthew Weiner.
But take The Unit, for example. One of the exec producers on that is David Mamet. Yes, the David Mamet – the award-winning playwright and screenwriter who wrote Glengarry Glen Ross, Speed-the-plow, The Verdict and Wag The Dog, to name but a few classics. Who's going to edit his stuff, let alone himself?
So whenever Mamet writes a script for The Unit, it's always massively at odds with all the other scripts and contains an overload of his usual obsessions (martial arts, con tricks, overly manly behaviour). Surprisingly, they're never as good as the scripts by the other producers, sister Lynn Mamet and Eric L Haney, on whose book the show was based.
Callan is another show that comes to mind. Creator James Mitchell resolutely refused to acknowledge there had been any character development in between his contributions to the four series, so whenever he wrote a script, every character immediately reverted back to the behaviours and relationships they'd exhibited in the original pilot play.
Yet there are some shows where different voices are tolerated and allowed. Take Doctor Who. Although show runner/exec producer Russell T Davies can rewrite up to 60% of a script created by one of the other writers, you can still usually tell when Gareth Roberts or Steven Moffat is writing the week's episode – or when it's one of his own. And that's actually a great delight.
So today's question: how much should individual writers' voices be heard on TV shows – does it depend on the type of show and is the reason it's tolerated on some shows because there are only a few decent writers on the show and we just notice when there are some good episodes for a change?
Posted on October 17, 2008 | Post a comment |
Film
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on September 22, 2008 | 1 comment |
Doctor Who
Awards
Film
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on August 21, 2008 | Post a comment |
Doctor Who
Film
French TV
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on August 1, 2008 | 4 comments |
The Daily News will be back (if there is any news, of course, and I'm not too knackered) on Monday 18th August 2008
Doctor Who
Film
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on July 29, 2008 | 1 comment |
In the US: Sundays, AMC, 10pm/9c
In the UK: Acquired by BBC4 to air in 2009
Mad Men was something of a surprise for everyone when its first season arrived. Not only was it made by AMC, a network not really known for much – certainly not original dramas – it was very good indeed.
A period piece about Madison Avenue advertising men of the early 60s, it was stylish, clever and eye-opening, and spent considerable time demonstrating how much attitudes to just about everything have changed.
Unsurprisingly, it won a whole raft of awards. Now, here comes the second season, with much to prove. Yet set two years on, it's appropriately relaxed and cool – it has nothing to prove.
Continue reading "Review: Mad Men 2x1"
Posted on July 10, 2008 | 2 comments |
Doctor Who
Film
Commercials
Theatre
British TV
US TV
Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email
Posted on June 27, 2008 | 5 comments |
Today's Joanna Page is Richard Curtis's Love Actually.
Curtis has dominated British comedy, whether it's been on television or in the cinemas, for nearly three decades now. Following an early stint writing for Not the Nine O'Clock News in the 70s, he started to bestride us like a laughing, Islington-loving colossus the following decade with The Black Adder, its three sequel series and a couple of one-off spin-offs. Within a few years, he became the moving force behind Comic Relief and managed to notch up a couple of movies, including The Tall Guy, starring Jeff Goldblum and Emma Thompson.
In the 90s, he stormed through again, first unleashing Mr Bean on us all, before choosing to take over the world and introduce Hugh Grant to us all with Four Weddings and a Funeral. He went on to write Notting Hill and the screenplay for Bridget Jones's Diary. He also spent 13 years laughing at country folk for the mysteriously successful The Vicar of Dibley.
Love Actually, released in 2003, was his first attempt at directing a movie. It's kind of a composite rom com version of Crash (or a sicklier version of This Year's Love, which also featured Jo Page) in which just about every possible facet of love is explored through the inter-connected lives of various people around the world. With an incredible cast of stars, it is occasionally touching, sometimes funny, and usually irritating. But it has Joanna Page in it - provided you don't buy the censored DVD - so we'll forgive it.
Continue reading "Today's Joanna Page: Love Actually"
Read more on Sitting Tennant 2009 starts now