Highbury spurned a takeover offer

Not that I’m at all worried, being a regular contributor to iCreate, but Highbury’s not doing too well at the moment. Yesterday, the Independent on Sunday broke the news that Highbury spurned an approach from one of its former directors last week to buy some or all of its titles.

I’m guessing it could well be Imagine Publishing that made the approach, although that would only make sense if they were planning to expand or only take on the IT titles.

What staggers me though is how quickly it all went wrong. The Independent has a nice piece that analyses the recent history of the company, but I’m curious about how 3i so badly misjudged the situation only a year and a half ago. Well, it didn’t misjudge it from its perspective, of course, but Paragon certainly got the sharp end of it.

Iraqi elections not spying on own people unlawfully the story

George Bush

Don’t you just hate it when an interviewee, even the president of the United States, refuses to answer questions on a subject, saying “That’s not the story. This is the story…” and then talks about something that clearly isn’t the story? With the alleged unlawful spying on US citizens on the front page of most US papers, President Bush still wants to claim the Iraqi elections are the real story. I don’t think so.

BBC director says BBC news needs to be better. Journalists say BBC needs to be better

According to the Media Guardian, BBC director of nations and regions Pat Loughrey “has made a call to arms to his journalists, telling them to break more stories and be more courageous.”

He also said reporters needed to go out on the road to get stories, rather than spending too much time in the office on computers, relying on “air-conditioned journalism”.

“One of the sadnesses of the technological revolution in journalism is that one can get by with so-called reporting that is entirely based on the PC.

”It would be tragic if we let new technology facilitate a sterility of journalism where the number of stories diminishes because we haven’t the energy or the enterprise to go out and broaden the base.“

No kidding Pat. But here’s the thing. How can the BBC expect journalists to be writing more and more stories for more and more media each day, while simultaneously cutting back on resources and staff? Something’s got to give.

Technology isn’t the issue. For the most part, journalists are just turning to the tools that allow them to do their job as best they can with the time and resources available. The real issue is the resourcing behind journalists. Unless organisations are prepared to let journalists spend time outside the office, maybe not delivering stories for days or even weeks at a time, when are journalists actually going to have the time to break these all-important, investigative stories? If organisations aren’t prepared to pay the expenses necessary to research stories, how are reporters going to do their jobs properly?

Yes, certain skills and techniques are dying away, and that’s bad news for everyone. But the issue isn’t one of laziness in journalists: it’s of media organisations refusing to fund journalism properly. Loughrey’s remarks are simply a smokescreen for the BBC’s own failures in resourcing.

WatchingAmerica

A useful site designed to help Americans and non-Americans alike understand what the world thinks of current issues that involve the U.S by providing news and views about the United States published in other countries.

Hello pot. Kettle here: you’re black. Salon attacks Slate for boring election coverage

Salon has the cheek to attack Slate for boring coverage of the Iraq elections. While there are valid criticisms in the piece, the “boring” charge is amazing, given the sheer levels of frothing tedium that Salon strung together just over a year ago for the US elections. After that length of time writing snooze-worthy, yet rabid pieces that got everything wrong, right up until election day, Salon no longer has the right to call anyone’s election coverage dull.

Oh, the irony

How amusing. An article on Spiked about bad writing. Still, this particular article isn’t too awful and it does make a good point: polemical poetry really is bad.